| A Country Without A Mythology? PART IV |
| by Mike Perschon - Copyright © Mike Perschon 1997 |
| CANADIAN MYTHOLOGY |
|
"Searchers for a
Canadian identity have failed to realize that you can only have an identification
with something you can see or recognize. You need, if nothing else,
an image in a mirror. No other country cares enough about us to give
us back an image of ourselves that we can even resent. And apparently
we can't do it for ourselves, because so far our attempts to do so have
resembled those of the three blind men trying to describe the elephant.
Some of the descriptions have been worth something, but what they add
up to is fragmented, indecipherable. With what are we to identify ourselves?
|
|
- Germaine Warkentin, "An
Image In a Mirror"
|
| So many cultures
under one nation's flag; so many religions worshipping under the nameless
deity from the verse of Canada's national anthem "God keep our land glorious
and free." Which God, Goddess or gods? Is there one mythology and ritual
practice which personify the Canadian identity? Do Canadians identify
with one powerful dream which encompasses both temporal and spiritual
goals, such as it's southern neighbor's 'American dream?' In the 1970's
Hugh Hood, in his essay Moral imagination: Canadian thing, stated of Canadians;
"We can't make myths as the. . . unprincipled salesman of the American
Dream. Imagine a Canadian Dream. . . you can't." He shows that Canada
refuses to allow any of its public figures to aspire to greatness; in
the eventuality that they do, they leave to go to the United States. Even
such cultural heroes such as Louis Riel are only recently coming into
the area of mythology that politicians such as George Washington and outlaws
such as Jesse James have in the United States. (1970, pp. 32-33) For the
Americans, those folk heroes in some way embody ideals of the American
Dream. Canada has no such national heroes. "Canadian independence was
too cautiously won to produce figures with the glamour of Washington,
Hidalgo, Bolivar." (Dobbs, 1970, p. 22) Again, the conclusion is a Canada
devoid of national mythology, heroes, and ritual. |
| In a recent discourse
with a seventeen year old honor student, the author heard the voice of
a young Canadian desperately seeking Canadian heroes and a sense of Canadian
identity, a Canadian mythology to cling to and uphold in the face of the
world. Among his own Canadian heroes were writers such as Robertson Davies,
Margaret Atwood and poet/performer Leonard Cohen. As Joseph Campbell stated,
"The function of the artist is the mythologization of the environment
and the world." (Campbell & Moyers, 1988, p. 107) His reverence for this
particular milieu of Canadians agrees with S.M. Lipset's statement that
"the art and literature of a nation would most reflect as well as establish
her basic myths and values." (Quoted in O'Toole, 1993, p. 160, emphasis
O'Toole's) and echoed the hope of "intellectual heroism" which Kildare
Dobbs once wrote of in regards to men such as Marshall McLuhan and Northrop
Frye. Dobbs hoped that men such as these would prick "the bubble of illusion"
which Canada was in; a 'bubble' where people refused to see things for
what they truly are, where "Our funerary rites are all designed to conceal
the fact that death has intruded." Dobbs, contrary to David Mainse, felt
that Canada, "far from being disillusioned. . . wallows in illusion and
hysterically resists all attempts to show for what it is." (Dobbs, 1970,
pp. 22 & 25) |
| It was Frye
in particular who said Canadian literature was an "indispensable aid to
the knowledge of Canada (which) records what the Canadian imagination
has reacted to and. . . tells us things about this environment that nothing
else will." (Frye, 1982, p. 15) Frye protested the concept of Canada being
presented as a 'country without a mythology' and in the tradition of mythologists
such as Mircea Eliade showed that it is through Canadian literature that
Canadians can gain some sense of a national mythology. His studies revealed
a dark, unrefined wilderness, inhabited by Native and Inuit spirits and
monsters, a grand sense of the mysterious and "tragic themes of inexplicable
death and. . .evil that are threateningly chaotic in the most profound
sense." (O'Toole, 1993, pp. 161-163 & 165.) Interestingly enough, his
main sources of discovery came from the pages of both Margaret Atwood
and Robertson Davies. |
| Atwood published
a book in the early seventies called Survival, which was a study of Canadian
literature at the time. The entire thrust of the book is how Canadian
literature deals with the individual against a giant in some form or another,
striving for survival. The second chapter, "Nature the Monster," explains
how Nature as an almost personified entity is a common theme in Canadian
literature. "Not surprisingly in a country where such a high ratio of
trees, lakes and rocks to people, images from Nature are almost everywhere.
Added up, they depict a Nature that is often dead and unanswering or actively
hostile to man. . ." (Atwood, 1972, p.49) Atwood's view corroborates with
many people I spoke to during the course of this work. When asked for
an image or concept that people felt embodied Canada, the idea of "the
Land" as an nearly sentient force kept coming up. It is a frightening,
awe inspiring concept; "This terrifying, icy wilderness of mountains,
forests and bottomless lakes is also a magical, enchanted world inhabited
by primeval beings whose existence is undreamed of in a rational world
of regimented routine." In Canadian fantasy writer Charles DeLint's novel
Spiritwalk, an entire city block is transported to a primeval time; the
sudden intrusion of modern architecture on the ancient forest is devastating:
|
| |
"There was a sudden roaring
sound. . . the sofa they were sitting on tumbled over backward and
to one side. . . The air was filled with a crackle and crunch of
breaking wood and then a tree - a giant, full-grown. . .enormous
old oak tree - came pushing up out of the floor, splintering floorboards
and anything else in its way." (DeLint, 1992, p.207) |
|
|
| The concept
of the Land is central to DeLint's writing. The Wild Wood deals
with the destruction of the environment, and how a young woman's interaction
with the nature spirits which inhabit a nearby wood allows her to keep
the forest from complete destruction. The interaction of the supernatural
with the Natural is still a common theme in Canadian literature, even
it's popular forms. |
| Yet it is
not merely pantheism which inhabits Canadian literature as mythology.
It is not Nature worship in it's pure form; nor is it traditional religion
either, but rather, a merging of the two, with the concept of Nature running
concurrent through it all. Louis MacKendrick concluding from his studies
in Canadian literature that "the God of Canadian fiction is 'not a consistency
but a diversity, a multifaceted deity'. . .a personal God formed and transformed
in the eye of the beholder, a projection of the self no longer confined
to the traditional symbolic forms of the Judaeo-Christian heritage." (O'Toole,
1993, p. 166 - emphasis mine) Many writers in Canadian literature are
hostile to Christianity in it's traditional, ecclesiastical form, all
the while writing stories and essays which extol Christian virtues. DeLint's
characters are almost all pagans or atheists, who have "no fight with
Jesus. . . or anything he tried to teach. The only problem I've got with
him is what people do in his name." (DeLint, 1992, p. 336) Yet they are
caught up in a constant struggle of good against evil, with the force
of good holding greater sway. "The best of us try to leave the world a
little better place than it was when we got here." (ibid, p. 336) Robertson
Davies observed that this influence of Christianity in Canada is ingrained,
even when people allegedly turn away from the faith. |
| |
"Oh this Christianity! Even when people
swear they don't believe in it, the fifteen hundred years of Christianity
that has made our world is in their bones, and they want to show
they can be Christians without Christ. Those are the worst; they
have the cruelty of doctrine without the poetic grace of myth."
(Davies, 1983, p. 218) |
|
|
| He stated that it was "the simple truths
of Christianity" which Canadians adhered to. (Davies, 1977, p. 275) Concepts
such as "sacrifice, salvation, sin and redemption" still figure heavily
into Canadian literature. (O'Toole, 1993, p. 165) Rather than explicit
Christianity, one finds an 'implicit' Christianity, hidden within the
lives of moral characters and parables. |
| Perhaps Frye
was speaking prophetically, looking to the future which would be embodied
in 'generation X'ers' looking for a sense of national pride. In the past,
young Canadians tried to solve Frye's question of "where is here?" (regarding
Canada's lack of national awareness) by going away to places that knew
what they were, in the hope that there was a way to bring that sense of
awareness home. However, today's youth seem bent on changing the country
within the country; Canadian youth have a pride about their nation, largely
due to their identification with artists and writers. In the past year,
Canadian singer Alanis Morisette received international recognition for
her CD, Jagged Little Pill. Like Bryan Adams before her, Alanis has brought
a sense of national pride to our nation's youth. Charles DeLint was the
recipient of the William L. Crawford Award for Best New Fantasy Author
in 1985, and has also received international success, his fiction appearing
regularly in the Year's Best Fantasy volumes, in addition to praise from
some of the fantasy genre's best American writers such as Orson Scott
Card, Roger Zelazny and Andre Norton. |
| Many books
have been written in an area which is related to depth psychology, which
encourage people to create their own myth, building on the classical mythological
archetypes. This is used as a form of psychotherapy. (Pearson, 1991. P
295.) Perhaps this is what Canada needs to do: understand that it must
create its own mythology from within. Just as this can be used as a form
of psychological healing, perhaps it could also be a form of sociological
healing. |
| Part of Canada's
problem in finding it's own mythology and ritual, is that it has been
looking for it's identity away from home. Canadians have in the past been
so busy looking elsewhere for how Canada should be, that they forgot to
look around them. Atwood wrote of this in regards to the poem A Country
without a mythology. |
| |
We can believe with 'the stranger'
that Nature has withheld all revelation. Or indeed that Nature is
empty, has no revelation to give. . . Or we can take the hint that
the poet gives us: perhaps the stranger has been given a revelation
but has not been able to recognize it. There is an image of the
divine present in the landscape - the 'manitou' which the Indians
have carved. . .because the mythic figure, 'the manitou' is not
a 'golden-haired Archangel' it is. . . rejected as impure and dangerous.
. . the traveller's. . . European Christian fantasies are only wishful
thinking, and of a destructive kind; they prevent him from making
meaningful contact with his actual environment. Perhaps this is
why he remains a stranger: he's looking for the wrong thing in the
wrong place." (Atwood, 1972, p. 54) |
|
|
| It is a strong
possibility that the reason Canada lacks a spiritual (not to mention national)
cohesiveness is that it's citizens have been looking for a way to make
faiths which come from different countries into the faith of the present
nation. Canada is made up of Christians, but it is not a Christian nation.
It is made of Muslims, but it is not a nation under Islam. I have heard
Canada described as a pagan nation, but am uncertain this is an appropriate
description either. |
| It is obvious
that the nation cannot as a whole return to the practices which once made
up the mythology and ritual of Canada prior to its settlement. Canada
may be made up of Natives, but it is no longer made up solely of First
Nations peoples. Robertson Davies made a great analogy to this problem
when he described the United States and Canada as sisters, with Great
Britain as the mother. The United States was the older sister who didn't
do as she was told, and so fell out of grace with mother, while Canada
was the obedient child, the younger sibling, who stayed at home. Unfortunately,
when the older sister became successful in her endeavors, the mother once
again took notice, and for the most part, the younger sister was forgotten.
Davies made the point that while Canada was not a young nation, it was
a nation which had "achieved adulthood comparatively recently" (Davies,
1977, p.274) Canada has only really just begun the journey to understand
it's identity. The areas of mythology and ritual fall under this quest.
Already, as has been shown, the writer's and artists of Canada have attempted
to define a mythology for the nation. And it would appear that some cohesiveness
is emerging. |
| PART V: CONCLUSION and BIBLIOGRAPHY
coming soon! |